Skip to content

EdgeGlidePath vs PX Wave

EdgeEndo · Perfect Dental (Shenzhen Perfect Medical Instruments)

TR

EdgeGlidePath™

EdgeEndo

FireWire Rotary Glide Path

View protocol →

PX Wave™

Perfect Dental (Shenzhen Perfect Medical Instruments)

Single-File Reciprocating Glider

View protocol →

Clinical Tip

Compare specifications above to choose the best system for your clinical case.

Specifications

Specifications comparison: EdgeGlidePath vs PX Wave
EdgeGlidePathPX Wave
ManufacturerEdgeEndoPerfect Dental (Shenzhen Perfect Medical Instruments)
AlloyFireWire™ Heat-Treated NiTiNiTi
Heat TreatmentFire-WireConventional
MotionContinuous RotationReciprocating
Files11
Tapervariable2%
Cross-sectionTriangularNot specified in IFU text
Speed300 RPM300 RPM
Torque2 Ncm5 Ncm
Use TypeSingle-useSingle-use

Best For

EdgeGlidePath

rotary glide path creationreplacing multiple hand files in glide path steppairing with EdgeEndo shaping systems

PX Wave

single-file reciprocating glide pathnarrow canalsvalue-tier reciprocating workflow

Key Features

EdgeGlidePath

Single rotary glide path file replacing up to 8 instruments (hand files + Gates Glidden) with 1mm max flute diameter

PX Wave

Single 15/.02 (ISO 015/.02) instrument at 300 rpm and 5.0 N·cm torque (per IFU spec table). Brand name "Wave" is consistent with a reciprocating instrument but the PX Wave IFU text does not explicitly call out reciprocating motion — motion type inferred from product family naming