Skip to content

EdgeGlidePath vs TF4

EdgeEndo · Perfect Dental (Shenzhen Perfect Medical Instruments)

TR

EdgeGlidePath™

EdgeEndo

FireWire Rotary Glide Path

View protocol →

TF4™

Perfect Dental (Shenzhen Perfect Medical Instruments)

Rotary + Reciprocating Hybrid Sequence

View protocol →

Clinical Tip

Compare specifications above to choose the best system for your clinical case.

Specifications

Specifications comparison: EdgeGlidePath vs TF4
EdgeGlidePathTF4
ManufacturerEdgeEndoPerfect Dental (Shenzhen Perfect Medical Instruments)
AlloyFireWire™ Heat-Treated NiTiNiTi
Heat TreatmentFire-WireConventional
MotionContinuous RotationContinuous Rotation
Files14
TapervariableVariable
Cross-sectionTriangularNot specified by name in IFU text
Speed300 RPM350 RPM
Torque2 Ncm2 Ncm
Use TypeSingle-useSingle-use

Best For

EdgeGlidePath

rotary glide path creationreplacing multiple hand files in glide path steppairing with EdgeEndo shaping systems

TF4

rotary + reciprocating hybrid workflowclinicians comfortable switching motor modes mid-casemoderate-curvature anatomy

Key Features

EdgeGlidePath

Single rotary glide path file replacing up to 8 instruments (hand files + Gates Glidden) with 1mm max flute diameter

TF4

Four-file hybrid sequence (T20 20/.07, T25 25/.07, T35 35/.06, T45 45/.05) where T25 25/.07 is run in reciprocating motion within an otherwise rotary workflow at 350 rpm / 2.0–3.0 N·cm (per IFU spec table and step-by-step)