Skip to content

EdgeGlidePath vs ProTaper Next

EdgeEndo · Dentsply Sirona

TR

EdgeGlidePath™

EdgeEndo

FireWire Rotary Glide Path

View protocol →

ProTaper Next®

Dentsply Sirona

Progressive Efficiency

View protocol →

Clinical Tip

Compare specifications above to choose the best system for your clinical case.

Specifications

Specifications comparison: EdgeGlidePath vs ProTaper Next
EdgeGlidePathProTaper Next
ManufacturerEdgeEndoDentsply Sirona
AlloyFireWire™ Heat-Treated NiTiM-Wire NiTi
Heat TreatmentFire-WireM-Wire
MotionContinuous RotationContinuous Rotation
Files16
TapervariableVariable
Cross-sectionTriangularNot specified by manufacturer, Off-centered rectangular
Speed300 RPM300 RPM
Torque2 Ncm2 Ncm
Use TypeSingle-useSingle-use

Best For

EdgeGlidePath

rotary glide path creationreplacing multiple hand files in glide path steppairing with EdgeEndo shaping systems

ProTaper Next

off-centered swaggering motionreduced file engagementprogressive shaping

Key Features

EdgeGlidePath

Single rotary glide path file replacing up to 8 instruments (hand files + Gates Glidden) with 1mm max flute diameter

ProTaper Next

Off-centered rectangular cross-section creates swaggering motion for improved debris removal