Skip to content

EdgeGlidePath vs Vortex Blue

EdgeEndo · Dentsply Sirona

TR

EdgeGlidePath™

EdgeEndo

FireWire Rotary Glide Path

View protocol →

Vortex Blue®

Dentsply Sirona

Blue Wire Crown-Down

View protocol →

Clinical Tip

Compare specifications above to choose the best system for your clinical case.

Specifications

Specifications comparison: EdgeGlidePath vs Vortex Blue
EdgeGlidePathVortex Blue
ManufacturerEdgeEndoDentsply Sirona
AlloyFireWire™ Heat-Treated NiTiBlue Heat-Treated NiTi
Heat TreatmentFire-WireBlue Heat-Treated
MotionContinuous RotationContinuous Rotation
Files116
Tapervariable4%, 6%
Cross-sectionTriangularConvex triangular
Speed300 RPM500 RPM
Torque2 Ncm75–368 Ncm
Use TypeSingle-useSingle-use

Best For

EdgeGlidePath

rotary glide path creationreplacing multiple hand files in glide path steppairing with EdgeEndo shaping systems

Vortex Blue

crown-down versatility with dual taper optionswide size range from 15-50balanced fatigue resistance and torque strength

Key Features

EdgeGlidePath

Single rotary glide path file replacing up to 8 instruments (hand files + Gates Glidden) with 1mm max flute diameter

Vortex Blue

Blue heat treatment provides min 65% better cyclic fatigue resistance vs M-Wire NiTi and at least 42% higher peak torque strength (manufacturer data)