Skip to content

EndoSequence vs iRaCe

Brasseler USA · FKG Dentaire

TR

EndoSequence®

Brasseler USA

Crown-Down Precision

View protocol →

iRaCe®

FKG Dentaire

3-File Simplicity

View protocol →

Clinical Tip

Compare specifications above to choose the best system for your clinical case.

Specifications

Specifications comparison: EndoSequence vs iRaCe
EndoSequenceiRaCe
ManufacturerBrasseler USAFKG Dentaire
AlloyConventional NiTi (Electropolished)Conventional NiTi (Electropolished)
Heat TreatmentConventionalConventional
MotionContinuous RotationContinuous Rotation
Files95
Taper4%Variable
Cross-sectionTriangular (ACP)Triangular
Speed500 RPM600 RPM
Torque1.8 Ncm1.5 Ncm
Use TypeSingle-useReusable (limited)

Best For

EndoSequence

crown-down technique with canal-sized file kitswide range of canal sizes with dual taper (.04/.06) options — sizes 15-50 shown here, 55-80 also available as X-Large packsynchronized obturation system (BC Points + BC Sealer)

iRaCe

simplified 3-file rotary sequencedifficult canals via iRaCe Plus extension (narrow, curved, calcified)individual file selection approach

Key Features

EndoSequence

Patented Alternating Contact Point (ACP) design with Expeditor canal-sizing file and crown-down technique at 500-600 RPM

iRaCe

Simplified 3-file sequence (R1-R2-R3) with iRaCe Plus extension for difficult canals — alternating cutting edges and triangular cross-section at 600 RPM