Skip to content

EndoSequence vs ProTaper Next

Brasseler USA · Dentsply Sirona

TR

EndoSequence®

Brasseler USA

Crown-Down Precision

View protocol →

ProTaper Next®

Dentsply Sirona

Progressive Efficiency

View protocol →

Clinical Tip

Compare specifications above to choose the best system for your clinical case.

Specifications

Specifications comparison: EndoSequence vs ProTaper Next
EndoSequenceProTaper Next
ManufacturerBrasseler USADentsply Sirona
AlloyConventional NiTi (Electropolished)M-Wire NiTi
Heat TreatmentConventionalM-Wire
MotionContinuous RotationContinuous Rotation
Files96
Taper4%Variable
Cross-sectionTriangular (ACP)Not specified by manufacturer, Off-centered rectangular
Speed500 RPM300 RPM
Torque1.8 Ncm2 Ncm
Use TypeSingle-useSingle-use

Best For

EndoSequence

crown-down technique with canal-sized file kitswide range of canal sizes with dual taper (.04/.06) options — sizes 15-50 shown here, 55-80 also available as X-Large packsynchronized obturation system (BC Points + BC Sealer)

ProTaper Next

off-centered swaggering motionreduced file engagementprogressive shaping

Key Features

EndoSequence

Patented Alternating Contact Point (ACP) design with Expeditor canal-sizing file and crown-down technique at 500-600 RPM

ProTaper Next

Off-centered rectangular cross-section creates swaggering motion for improved debris removal