Skip to content

EndoSequence vs XP-endo Shaper

Brasseler USA · FKG Dentaire

TR

EndoSequence®

Brasseler USA

Crown-Down Precision

View protocol →

XP-endo® Shaper

FKG Dentaire

Adaptive Core

View protocol →

Clinical Tip

Compare specifications above to choose the best system for your clinical case.

Specifications

Specifications comparison: EndoSequence vs XP-endo Shaper
EndoSequenceXP-endo Shaper
ManufacturerBrasseler USAFKG Dentaire
AlloyConventional NiTi (Electropolished)MaxWire (NiTi alloy)
Heat TreatmentConventionalMaxWire
MotionContinuous RotationContinuous Rotation
Files92
Taper4%1% (expands to at least 4%), 0%
Cross-sectionTriangular (ACP)Booster Tip (6 cutting edges at tip, triangular shaft), Zero-taper sickle-shaped (cleaning, non-shaping)
Speed500 RPM800 RPM
Torque1.8 Ncm1 Ncm
Use TypeSingle-useSingle-use

Best For

EndoSequence

crown-down technique with canal-sized file kitswide range of canal sizes with dual taper (.04/.06) options — sizes 15-50 shown here, 55-80 also available as X-Large packsynchronized obturation system (BC Points + BC Sealer)

XP-endo Shaper

irregular/oval canals3D adaptation at body temperatureminimized transportation in curved canals

Key Features

EndoSequence

Patented Alternating Contact Point (ACP) design with Expeditor canal-sizing file and crown-down technique at 500-600 RPM

XP-endo Shaper

Expands at body temperature to adapt to canal anatomy (shown as Shaper Plus sequence: Shaper + Finisher)