Skip to content

ESX vs iRaCe

Brasseler USA · FKG Dentaire

TR

ESX®

Brasseler USA

Two-File Shaping with Patented Booster Tip

View protocol →

iRaCe®

FKG Dentaire

3-File Simplicity

View protocol →

Clinical Tip

Compare specifications above to choose the best system for your clinical case.

Specifications

Specifications comparison: ESX vs iRaCe
ESXiRaCe
ManufacturerBrasseler USAFKG Dentaire
AlloyElectropolished NiTiConventional NiTi (Electropolished)
Heat TreatmentConventionalConventional
MotionContinuous RotationContinuous Rotation
Files85
TaperVariableVariable
Cross-sectionTriangular (asymmetrical ACP)Triangular
Speed500 RPM600 RPM
Torque1.5 Ncm1.5 Ncm
Use TypeSingle-useReusable (limited)

Best For

ESX

minimally invasive two-file canal preparationconservative coronal tooth structure preservationcases where adaptive finishing file size selection is preferred

iRaCe

simplified 3-file rotary sequencedifficult canals via iRaCe Plus extension (narrow, curved, calcified)individual file selection approach

Key Features

ESX

Two-file shaping system with patented ACP (Alternating Contact Point) design and Booster Tip for minimally invasive canal preparation at 500-600 RPM

iRaCe

Simplified 3-file sequence (R1-R2-R3) with iRaCe Plus extension for difficult canals — alternating cutting edges and triangular cross-section at 600 RPM