Skip to content

ESX vs ProTaper Next

Brasseler USA · Dentsply Sirona

TR

ESX®

Brasseler USA

Two-File Shaping with Patented Booster Tip

View protocol →

ProTaper Next®

Dentsply Sirona

Progressive Efficiency

View protocol →

Clinical Tip

Compare specifications above to choose the best system for your clinical case.

Specifications

Specifications comparison: ESX vs ProTaper Next
ESXProTaper Next
ManufacturerBrasseler USADentsply Sirona
AlloyElectropolished NiTiM-Wire NiTi
Heat TreatmentConventionalM-Wire
MotionContinuous RotationContinuous Rotation
Files86
TaperVariableVariable
Cross-sectionTriangular (asymmetrical ACP)Not specified by manufacturer, Off-centered rectangular
Speed500 RPM300 RPM
Torque1.5 Ncm2 Ncm
Use TypeSingle-useSingle-use

Best For

ESX

minimally invasive two-file canal preparationconservative coronal tooth structure preservationcases where adaptive finishing file size selection is preferred

ProTaper Next

off-centered swaggering motionreduced file engagementprogressive shaping

Key Features

ESX

Two-file shaping system with patented ACP (Alternating Contact Point) design and Booster Tip for minimally invasive canal preparation at 500-600 RPM

ProTaper Next

Off-centered rectangular cross-section creates swaggering motion for improved debris removal