Skip to content

ESX vs XP-endo Shaper

Brasseler USA · FKG Dentaire

TR

ESX®

Brasseler USA

Two-File Shaping with Patented Booster Tip

View protocol →

XP-endo® Shaper

FKG Dentaire

Adaptive Core

View protocol →

Clinical Tip

Compare specifications above to choose the best system for your clinical case.

Specifications

Specifications comparison: ESX vs XP-endo Shaper
ESXXP-endo Shaper
ManufacturerBrasseler USAFKG Dentaire
AlloyElectropolished NiTiMaxWire (NiTi alloy)
Heat TreatmentConventionalMaxWire
MotionContinuous RotationContinuous Rotation
Files82
TaperVariable1% (expands to at least 4%), 0%
Cross-sectionTriangular (asymmetrical ACP)Booster Tip (6 cutting edges at tip, triangular shaft), Zero-taper sickle-shaped (cleaning, non-shaping)
Speed500 RPM800 RPM
Torque1.5 Ncm1 Ncm
Use TypeSingle-useSingle-use

Best For

ESX

minimally invasive two-file canal preparationconservative coronal tooth structure preservationcases where adaptive finishing file size selection is preferred

XP-endo Shaper

irregular/oval canals3D adaptation at body temperatureminimized transportation in curved canals

Key Features

ESX

Two-file shaping system with patented ACP (Alternating Contact Point) design and Booster Tip for minimally invasive canal preparation at 500-600 RPM

XP-endo Shaper

Expands at body temperature to adapt to canal anatomy (shown as Shaper Plus sequence: Shaper + Finisher)