Skip to content

iRaCe vs Mtwo

FKG Dentaire · VDW GmbH

TR

iRaCe®

FKG Dentaire

3-File Simplicity

View protocol →

Mtwo®

VDW GmbH

The Efficient NiTi System

View protocol →

Clinical Tip

Compare specifications above to choose the best system for your clinical case.

Specifications

Specifications comparison: iRaCe vs Mtwo
iRaCeMtwo
ManufacturerFKG DentaireVDW GmbH
AlloyConventional NiTi (Electropolished)Conventional NiTi
Heat TreatmentConventionalConventional
MotionContinuous RotationContinuous Rotation
Files516
TaperVariableVariable
Cross-sectionTriangularS-shaped, S-shaped (reduced)
Speed600 RPM280 RPM
Torque1.5 Ncm0.3–3 Ncm
Use TypeReusable (limited)Reusable (limited)

Best For

iRaCe

simplified 3-file rotary sequencedifficult canals via iRaCe Plus extension (narrow, curved, calcified)individual file selection approach

Mtwo

Simultaneous Shaping to full WLall-in-one basic 4-file sequencewide range of apical finishing sizes

Key Features

iRaCe

Simplified 3-file sequence (R1-R2-R3) with iRaCe Plus extension for difficult canals — alternating cutting edges and triangular cross-section at 600 RPM

Mtwo

Simultaneous Shaping with S-shaped cross-section — all instruments to full working length in a single sequence