Skip to content

iRaCe vs PX Wave

FKG Dentaire · Perfect Dental (Shenzhen Perfect Medical Instruments)

TR

iRaCe®

FKG Dentaire

3-File Simplicity

View protocol →

PX Wave™

Perfect Dental (Shenzhen Perfect Medical Instruments)

Single-File Reciprocating Glider

View protocol →

Clinical Tip

Compare specifications above to choose the best system for your clinical case.

Specifications

Specifications comparison: iRaCe vs PX Wave
iRaCePX Wave
ManufacturerFKG DentairePerfect Dental (Shenzhen Perfect Medical Instruments)
AlloyConventional NiTi (Electropolished)NiTi
Heat TreatmentConventionalConventional
MotionContinuous RotationReciprocating
Files51
TaperVariable2%
Cross-sectionTriangularNot specified in IFU text
Speed600 RPM300 RPM
Torque1.5 Ncm5 Ncm
Use TypeReusable (limited)Single-use

Best For

iRaCe

simplified 3-file rotary sequencedifficult canals via iRaCe Plus extension (narrow, curved, calcified)individual file selection approach

PX Wave

single-file reciprocating glide pathnarrow canalsvalue-tier reciprocating workflow

Key Features

iRaCe

Simplified 3-file sequence (R1-R2-R3) with iRaCe Plus extension for difficult canals — alternating cutting edges and triangular cross-section at 600 RPM

PX Wave

Single 15/.02 (ISO 015/.02) instrument at 300 rpm and 5.0 N·cm torque (per IFU spec table). Brand name "Wave" is consistent with a reciprocating instrument but the PX Wave IFU text does not explicitly call out reciprocating motion — motion type inferred from product family naming