Skip to content

iRaCe vs ProTaper Next

FKG Dentaire · Dentsply Sirona

TR

iRaCe®

FKG Dentaire

3-File Simplicity

View protocol →

ProTaper Next®

Dentsply Sirona

Progressive Efficiency

View protocol →

Clinical Tip

Compare specifications above to choose the best system for your clinical case.

Specifications

Specifications comparison: iRaCe vs ProTaper Next
iRaCeProTaper Next
ManufacturerFKG DentaireDentsply Sirona
AlloyConventional NiTi (Electropolished)M-Wire NiTi
Heat TreatmentConventionalM-Wire
MotionContinuous RotationContinuous Rotation
Files56
TaperVariableVariable
Cross-sectionTriangularNot specified by manufacturer, Off-centered rectangular
Speed600 RPM300 RPM
Torque1.5 Ncm2 Ncm
Use TypeReusable (limited)Single-use

Best For

iRaCe

simplified 3-file rotary sequencedifficult canals via iRaCe Plus extension (narrow, curved, calcified)individual file selection approach

ProTaper Next

off-centered swaggering motionreduced file engagementprogressive shaping

Key Features

iRaCe

Simplified 3-file sequence (R1-R2-R3) with iRaCe Plus extension for difficult canals — alternating cutting edges and triangular cross-section at 600 RPM

ProTaper Next

Off-centered rectangular cross-section creates swaggering motion for improved debris removal