Skip to content

iRaCe vs TruNatomy

FKG Dentaire · Dentsply Sirona

TR

iRaCe®

FKG Dentaire

3-File Simplicity

View protocol →

TruNatomy®

Dentsply Sirona

True, Natural, Anatomy

View protocol →

Clinical Tip

Compare specifications above to choose the best system for your clinical case.

Specifications

Specifications comparison: iRaCe vs TruNatomy
iRaCeTruNatomy
ManufacturerFKG DentaireDentsply Sirona
AlloyConventional NiTi (Electropolished)Heat-Treated NiTi
Heat TreatmentConventionalOther
MotionContinuous RotationContinuous Rotation
Files56
TaperVariableVariable
Cross-sectionTriangularOff-centered parallelogram, Centered parallelogram (2 cutting edges)
Speed600 RPM500 RPM
Torque1.5 Ncm1.5 Ncm
Use TypeReusable (limited)Single-use

Best For

iRaCe

simplified 3-file rotary sequencedifficult canals via iRaCe Plus extension (narrow, curved, calcified)individual file selection approach

TruNatomy

dentin preservationconservative accessminimally invasive

Key Features

iRaCe

Simplified 3-file sequence (R1-R2-R3) with iRaCe Plus extension for difficult canals — alternating cutting edges and triangular cross-section at 600 RPM

TruNatomy

Slim 0.8mm MFD with off-centered parallelogram cross-section preserves peri-cervical dentin while maintaining shaping efficiency