Skip to content

iRaCe vs 2Shape

FKG Dentaire · Micro-Mega (COLTENE)

TR

iRaCe®

FKG Dentaire

3-File Simplicity

View protocol →

2Shape®

Micro-Mega (COLTENE)

Two-File Simplicity

View protocol →

Clinical Tip

Compare specifications above to choose the best system for your clinical case.

Specifications

Specifications comparison: iRaCe vs 2Shape
iRaCe2Shape
ManufacturerFKG DentaireMicro-Mega (COLTENE)
AlloyConventional NiTi (Electropolished)T.Wire Heat-Treated NiTi
Heat TreatmentConventionalOther
MotionContinuous RotationContinuous Rotation
Files54
TaperVariable.04, .06
Cross-sectionTriangularAsymmetrical triple helix
Speed600 RPM250 RPM
Torque1.5 Ncm2–2.5 Ncm
Use TypeReusable (limited)Reusable (limited)

Best For

iRaCe

simplified 3-file rotary sequencedifficult canals via iRaCe Plus extension (narrow, curved, calcified)individual file selection approach

2Shape

simplified 2-file shapingEU/ME market standardasymmetrical triple helix debris removal

Key Features

iRaCe

Simplified 3-file sequence (R1-R2-R3) with iRaCe Plus extension for difficult canals — alternating cutting edges and triangular cross-section at 600 RPM

2Shape

Intuitive 2-file sequence (TS1+TS2) with asymmetrical triple helix cross-section and T.Wire heat treatment