Skip to content

iRaCe vs Vortex Blue

FKG Dentaire · Dentsply Sirona

TR

iRaCe®

FKG Dentaire

3-File Simplicity

View protocol →

Vortex Blue®

Dentsply Sirona

Blue Wire Crown-Down

View protocol →

Clinical Tip

Compare specifications above to choose the best system for your clinical case.

Specifications

Specifications comparison: iRaCe vs Vortex Blue
iRaCeVortex Blue
ManufacturerFKG DentaireDentsply Sirona
AlloyConventional NiTi (Electropolished)Blue Heat-Treated NiTi
Heat TreatmentConventionalBlue Heat-Treated
MotionContinuous RotationContinuous Rotation
Files516
TaperVariable4%, 6%
Cross-sectionTriangularConvex triangular
Speed600 RPM500 RPM
Torque1.5 Ncm75–368 Ncm
Use TypeReusable (limited)Single-use

Best For

iRaCe

simplified 3-file rotary sequencedifficult canals via iRaCe Plus extension (narrow, curved, calcified)individual file selection approach

Vortex Blue

crown-down versatility with dual taper optionswide size range from 15-50balanced fatigue resistance and torque strength

Key Features

iRaCe

Simplified 3-file sequence (R1-R2-R3) with iRaCe Plus extension for difficult canals — alternating cutting edges and triangular cross-section at 600 RPM

Vortex Blue

Blue heat treatment provides min 65% better cyclic fatigue resistance vs M-Wire NiTi and at least 42% higher peak torque strength (manufacturer data)