Skip to content

iRaCe vs XP-endo Rise

FKG Dentaire

TR

iRaCe®

FKG Dentaire

3-File Simplicity

View protocol →

XP-endo® Rise

FKG Dentaire

2-in-1 Agile Spirit

View protocol →

Clinical Tip

Compare specifications above to choose the best system for your clinical case.

Specifications

Specifications comparison: iRaCe vs XP-endo Rise
iRaCeXP-endo Rise
ManufacturerFKG DentaireFKG Dentaire
AlloyConventional NiTi (Electropolished)MaxWire (NiTi alloy)
Heat TreatmentConventionalMaxWire
MotionContinuous RotationContinuous Rotation
Files52
TaperVariable4%
Cross-sectionTriangularMaxWire expandable design, MaxWire expandable design (2-in-1: shaping + retreatment)
Speed600 RPM1000 RPM
Torque1.5 Ncm1 Ncm
Use TypeReusable (limited)Reusable (limited)

Best For

iRaCe

simplified 3-file rotary sequencedifficult canals via iRaCe Plus extension (narrow, curved, calcified)individual file selection approach

XP-endo Rise

minimally invasive canal shaping with anatomical adaptation2-in-1 treatment and retreatment with a single shaper filesimplified 2-file workflow at uniform motor settings

Key Features

iRaCe

Simplified 3-file sequence (R1-R2-R3) with iRaCe Plus extension for difficult canals — alternating cutting edges and triangular cross-section at 600 RPM

XP-endo Rise

2-file system with exclusive 2-in-1 Shaper that serves both initial treatment and retreatment — MaxWire technology at uniform 1000 RPM / 1.0 Ncm, up to 8 canals per instrument