Skip to content

iRaCe vs XP-endo Shaper

FKG Dentaire

TR

iRaCe®

FKG Dentaire

3-File Simplicity

View protocol →

XP-endo® Shaper

FKG Dentaire

Adaptive Core

View protocol →

Clinical Tip

Compare specifications above to choose the best system for your clinical case.

Specifications

Specifications comparison: iRaCe vs XP-endo Shaper
iRaCeXP-endo Shaper
ManufacturerFKG DentaireFKG Dentaire
AlloyConventional NiTi (Electropolished)MaxWire (NiTi alloy)
Heat TreatmentConventionalMaxWire
MotionContinuous RotationContinuous Rotation
Files52
TaperVariable1% (expands to at least 4%), 0%
Cross-sectionTriangularBooster Tip (6 cutting edges at tip, triangular shaft), Zero-taper sickle-shaped (cleaning, non-shaping)
Speed600 RPM800 RPM
Torque1.5 Ncm1 Ncm
Use TypeReusable (limited)Single-use

Best For

iRaCe

simplified 3-file rotary sequencedifficult canals via iRaCe Plus extension (narrow, curved, calcified)individual file selection approach

XP-endo Shaper

irregular/oval canals3D adaptation at body temperatureminimized transportation in curved canals

Key Features

iRaCe

Simplified 3-file sequence (R1-R2-R3) with iRaCe Plus extension for difficult canals — alternating cutting edges and triangular cross-section at 600 RPM

XP-endo Shaper

Expands at body temperature to adapt to canal anatomy (shown as Shaper Plus sequence: Shaper + Finisher)