Skip to content

Mtwo vs ProGlider

VDW GmbH · Dentsply Sirona

TR

Mtwo®

VDW GmbH

The Efficient NiTi System

View protocol →

ProGlider®

Dentsply Sirona

Mechanical Glide Path in One File

View protocol →

Clinical Tip

Compare specifications above to choose the best system for your clinical case.

Specifications

Specifications comparison: Mtwo vs ProGlider
MtwoProGlider
ManufacturerVDW GmbHDentsply Sirona
AlloyConventional NiTiM-Wire NiTi
Heat TreatmentConventionalM-Wire
MotionContinuous RotationContinuous Rotation
Files161
TaperVariable2% (variable progressive to 8.5% at D16)
Cross-sectionS-shaped, S-shaped (reduced)Square
Speed280 RPM300 RPM
Torque0.3–3 Ncm2 Ncm
Use TypeReusable (limited)Single-use

Best For

Mtwo

Simultaneous Shaping to full WLall-in-one basic 4-file sequencewide range of apical finishing sizes

ProGlider

single-file mechanical glide pathcompanion to ProTaper Gold, ProTaper Next, ProTaper Ultimate, and Vortex Bluereplacing multi-file PathFile sequence

Key Features

Mtwo

Simultaneous Shaping with S-shaped cross-section — all instruments to full working length in a single sequence

ProGlider

Single-file mechanical glide path with variable progressive taper (016/.02 to .085 at D16) for gentle canal enlargement before shaping