Skip to content

MG3 vs PX Wave

Perfect Dental (Shenzhen Perfect Medical Instruments)

TR

MG3™

Perfect Dental (Shenzhen Perfect Medical Instruments)

Easy / Efficient / Safe

View protocol →

PX Wave™

Perfect Dental (Shenzhen Perfect Medical Instruments)

Single-File Reciprocating Glider

View protocol →

Clinical Tip

Compare specifications above to choose the best system for your clinical case.

Specifications

Specifications comparison: MG3 vs PX Wave
MG3PX Wave
ManufacturerPerfect Dental (Shenzhen Perfect Medical Instruments)Perfect Dental (Shenzhen Perfect Medical Instruments)
AlloyConventional NiTiNiTi
Heat TreatmentConventionalConventional
MotionContinuous RotationReciprocating
Files61
TaperVariable2%
Cross-sectionBrochure cross-section illustration (geometry name not given)Not specified in IFU text
Speed350 RPM300 RPM
Torque3 Ncm5 Ncm
Use TypeSingle-useSingle-use

Best For

MG3

value-tier rotary multi-file sequencegeneral shaping in mild–moderate curvaturepractices wanting a structured glide-path → shaper workflow

PX Wave

single-file reciprocating glide pathnarrow canalsvalue-tier reciprocating workflow

Key Features

MG3

Six-file rotary sequence (Starter orifice opener + P1/P2 glide path + G1/G2/G3 shapers) with non-cutting tip, incremental thread spacing, and brochure-described cross-section advantages of improved performance, lower fracture tendency, and better debris removal (per brochure)

PX Wave

Single 15/.02 (ISO 015/.02) instrument at 300 rpm and 5.0 N·cm torque (per IFU spec table). Brand name "Wave" is consistent with a reciprocating instrument but the PX Wave IFU text does not explicitly call out reciprocating motion — motion type inferred from product family naming