Skip to content

PX Wave vs 2Shape

Perfect Dental (Shenzhen Perfect Medical Instruments) · Micro-Mega (COLTENE)

TR

PX Wave™

Perfect Dental (Shenzhen Perfect Medical Instruments)

Single-File Reciprocating Glider

View protocol →

2Shape®

Micro-Mega (COLTENE)

Two-File Simplicity

View protocol →

Clinical Tip

Compare specifications above to choose the best system for your clinical case.

Specifications

Specifications comparison: PX Wave vs 2Shape
PX Wave2Shape
ManufacturerPerfect Dental (Shenzhen Perfect Medical Instruments)Micro-Mega (COLTENE)
AlloyNiTiT.Wire Heat-Treated NiTi
Heat TreatmentConventionalOther
MotionReciprocatingContinuous Rotation
Files14
Taper2%.04, .06
Cross-sectionNot specified in IFU textAsymmetrical triple helix
Speed300 RPM250 RPM
Torque5 Ncm2–2.5 Ncm
Use TypeSingle-useReusable (limited)

Best For

PX Wave

single-file reciprocating glide pathnarrow canalsvalue-tier reciprocating workflow

2Shape

simplified 2-file shapingEU/ME market standardasymmetrical triple helix debris removal

Key Features

PX Wave

Single 15/.02 (ISO 015/.02) instrument at 300 rpm and 5.0 N·cm torque (per IFU spec table). Brand name "Wave" is consistent with a reciprocating instrument but the PX Wave IFU text does not explicitly call out reciprocating motion — motion type inferred from product family naming

2Shape

Intuitive 2-file sequence (TS1+TS2) with asymmetrical triple helix cross-section and T.Wire heat treatment