Skip to content

RC vs XP-endo Shaper

Perfect Dental (Shenzhen Perfect Medical Instruments) · FKG Dentaire

TR

RC™

Perfect Dental (Shenzhen Perfect Medical Instruments)

Reciprocating NiTi — Original

View protocol →

XP-endo® Shaper

FKG Dentaire

Adaptive Core

View protocol →

Clinical Tip

Compare specifications above to choose the best system for your clinical case.

Specifications

Specifications comparison: RC vs XP-endo Shaper
RCXP-endo Shaper
ManufacturerPerfect Dental (Shenzhen Perfect Medical Instruments)FKG Dentaire
AlloyNiTi (conventional)MaxWire (NiTi alloy)
Heat TreatmentConventionalMaxWire
MotionReciprocatingContinuous Rotation
Files32
TaperVariable1% (expands to at least 4%), 0%
Cross-sectionNot specified in IFU textBooster Tip (6 cutting edges at tip, triangular shaft), Zero-taper sickle-shaped (cleaning, non-shaping)
Speed800 RPM
Torque2 Ncm1 Ncm
Use TypeSingle-useSingle-use

Best For

RC

value-tier reciprocating sequencegeneral shaping in mild–moderate curvaturepractices wanting an entry-level RC system

XP-endo Shaper

irregular/oval canals3D adaptation at body temperatureminimized transportation in curved canals

Key Features

RC

Three-instrument reciprocating set (R25 25/.08, R40 40/.06, R50 50/.05) operated at 250–360 rpm with 2.0–3.0 N·cm torque (per IFU spec table)

XP-endo Shaper

Expands at body temperature to adapt to canal anatomy (shown as Shaper Plus sequence: Shaper + Finisher)