Skip to content

ProGlider vs Vortex Blue

Dentsply Sirona

TR

ProGlider®

Dentsply Sirona

Mechanical Glide Path in One File

View protocol →

Vortex Blue®

Dentsply Sirona

Blue Wire Crown-Down

View protocol →

Clinical Tip

Compare specifications above to choose the best system for your clinical case.

Specifications

Specifications comparison: ProGlider vs Vortex Blue
ProGliderVortex Blue
ManufacturerDentsply SironaDentsply Sirona
AlloyM-Wire NiTiBlue Heat-Treated NiTi
Heat TreatmentM-WireBlue Heat-Treated
MotionContinuous RotationContinuous Rotation
Files116
Taper2% (variable progressive to 8.5% at D16)4%, 6%
Cross-sectionSquareConvex triangular
Speed300 RPM500 RPM
Torque2 Ncm75–368 Ncm
Use TypeSingle-useSingle-use

Best For

ProGlider

single-file mechanical glide pathcompanion to ProTaper Gold, ProTaper Next, ProTaper Ultimate, and Vortex Bluereplacing multi-file PathFile sequence

Vortex Blue

crown-down versatility with dual taper optionswide size range from 15-50balanced fatigue resistance and torque strength

Key Features

ProGlider

Single-file mechanical glide path with variable progressive taper (016/.02 to .085 at D16) for gentle canal enlargement before shaping

Vortex Blue

Blue heat treatment provides min 65% better cyclic fatigue resistance vs M-Wire NiTi and at least 42% higher peak torque strength (manufacturer data)