Skip to content

TruNatomy vs XP-endo Rise

Dentsply Sirona · FKG Dentaire

TR

TruNatomy®

Dentsply Sirona

True, Natural, Anatomy

View protocol →

XP-endo® Rise

FKG Dentaire

2-in-1 Agile Spirit

View protocol →

Clinical Tip

Compare specifications above to choose the best system for your clinical case.

Specifications

Specifications comparison: TruNatomy vs XP-endo Rise
TruNatomyXP-endo Rise
ManufacturerDentsply SironaFKG Dentaire
AlloyHeat-Treated NiTiMaxWire (NiTi alloy)
Heat TreatmentOtherMaxWire
MotionContinuous RotationContinuous Rotation
Files62
TaperVariable4%
Cross-sectionOff-centered parallelogram, Centered parallelogram (2 cutting edges)MaxWire expandable design, MaxWire expandable design (2-in-1: shaping + retreatment)
Speed500 RPM1000 RPM
Torque1.5 Ncm1 Ncm
Use TypeSingle-useReusable (limited)

Best For

TruNatomy

dentin preservationconservative accessminimally invasive

XP-endo Rise

minimally invasive canal shaping with anatomical adaptation2-in-1 treatment and retreatment with a single shaper filesimplified 2-file workflow at uniform motor settings

Key Features

TruNatomy

Slim 0.8mm MFD with off-centered parallelogram cross-section preserves peri-cervical dentin while maintaining shaping efficiency

XP-endo Rise

2-file system with exclusive 2-in-1 Shaper that serves both initial treatment and retreatment — MaxWire technology at uniform 1000 RPM / 1.0 Ncm, up to 8 canals per instrument