Skip to content

2Shape vs VDW.ROTATE

Micro-Mega (COLTENE) · VDW GmbH

TR

2Shape®

Micro-Mega (COLTENE)

Two-File Simplicity

View protocol →

VDW.ROTATE®

VDW GmbH

Simplified Rotary Efficiency

View protocol →

Clinical Tip

Compare specifications above to choose the best system for your clinical case.

Specifications

Specifications comparison: 2Shape vs VDW.ROTATE
2ShapeVDW.ROTATE
ManufacturerMicro-Mega (COLTENE)VDW GmbH
AlloyT.Wire Heat-Treated NiTiHeat-Treated NiTi
Heat TreatmentOtherOther
MotionContinuous RotationContinuous Rotation
Files413
Taper.04, .06Variable
Cross-sectionAsymmetrical triple helixAdapted S
Speed250 RPM300–400 RPM
Torque2–2.5 Ncm1.3–3.5 Ncm
Use TypeReusable (limited)Reusable (limited)

Best For

2Shape

simplified 2-file shapingEU/ME market standardasymmetrical triple helix debris removal

VDW.ROTATE

simplified 3-file workflowversatile pecking or brushing techniquebroad canal size range with extended files

Key Features

2Shape

Intuitive 2-file sequence (TS1+TS2) with asymmetrical triple helix cross-section and T.Wire heat treatment

VDW.ROTATE

3-file basic sequence with adapted S cross-section and file-specific heat treatment