Skip to content

2Shape vs XP-endo Shaper

Micro-Mega (COLTENE) · FKG Dentaire

TR

2Shape®

Micro-Mega (COLTENE)

Two-File Simplicity

View protocol →

XP-endo® Shaper

FKG Dentaire

Adaptive Core

View protocol →

Clinical Tip

Compare specifications above to choose the best system for your clinical case.

Specifications

Specifications comparison: 2Shape vs XP-endo Shaper
2ShapeXP-endo Shaper
ManufacturerMicro-Mega (COLTENE)FKG Dentaire
AlloyT.Wire Heat-Treated NiTiMaxWire (NiTi alloy)
Heat TreatmentOtherMaxWire
MotionContinuous RotationContinuous Rotation
Files42
Taper.04, .061% (expands to at least 4%), 0%
Cross-sectionAsymmetrical triple helixBooster Tip (6 cutting edges at tip, triangular shaft), Zero-taper sickle-shaped (cleaning, non-shaping)
Speed250 RPM800 RPM
Torque2–2.5 Ncm1 Ncm
Use TypeReusable (limited)Single-use

Best For

2Shape

simplified 2-file shapingEU/ME market standardasymmetrical triple helix debris removal

XP-endo Shaper

irregular/oval canals3D adaptationconservative accessretreatment

Key Features

2Shape

Intuitive 2-file sequence (TS1+TS2) with asymmetrical triple helix cross-section and T.Wire heat treatment

XP-endo Shaper

Expands at body temperature to adapt to canal anatomy