Skip to content

EdgeFile X7 vs PX Wave

EdgeEndo · Perfect Dental (Shenzhen Perfect Medical Instruments)

TR

EdgeFile® X7

EdgeEndo

Fire-Wire Crown-Down Rotary

View protocol →

PX Wave™

Perfect Dental (Shenzhen Perfect Medical Instruments)

Single-File Reciprocating Glider

View protocol →

Clinical Tip

Compare specifications above to choose the best system for your clinical case.

Specifications

Specifications comparison: EdgeFile X7 vs PX Wave
EdgeFile X7PX Wave
ManufacturerEdgeEndoPerfect Dental (Shenzhen Perfect Medical Instruments)
AlloyFire-Wire™ Annealed Heat-Treated NiTiNiTi
Heat TreatmentFire-WireConventional
MotionContinuous RotationReciprocating
Files141
Taper4%, 6%2%
Cross-sectionParabolic / variable diamondNot specified in IFU text
Speed300 RPM300 RPM
Torque300 Ncm5 Ncm
Use TypeSingle-useSingle-use

Best For

EdgeFile X7

crown-down rotary with enhanced fatigue resistancedual taper versatility (.04/.06)mid-cost North American market

PX Wave

single-file reciprocating glide pathnarrow canalsvalue-tier reciprocating workflow

Key Features

EdgeFile X7

Fire-Wire AHT eliminates shape memory for canal-contouring flexibility with enhanced cyclic fatigue resistance (manufacturer data)

PX Wave

Single 15/.02 (ISO 015/.02) instrument at 300 rpm and 5.0 N·cm torque (per IFU spec table). Brand name "Wave" is consistent with a reciprocating instrument but the PX Wave IFU text does not explicitly call out reciprocating motion — motion type inferred from product family naming