Skip to content

EdgeGlidePath vs RACE EVO

EdgeEndo · FKG Dentaire

TR

EdgeGlidePath™

EdgeEndo

FireWire Rotary Glide Path

View protocol →

RACE® EVO

FKG Dentaire

Heat-Treated 1-2-3 Sequence

View protocol →

Clinical Tip

Compare specifications above to choose the best system for your clinical case.

Specifications

Specifications comparison: EdgeGlidePath vs RACE EVO
EdgeGlidePathRACE EVO
ManufacturerEdgeEndoFKG Dentaire
AlloyFireWire™ Heat-Treated NiTiHeat-Treated NiTi (Blue)
Heat TreatmentFire-WireBlue Heat-Treated
MotionContinuous RotationContinuous Rotation
Files13
Tapervariable4%
Cross-sectionTriangularTriangular with alternating cutting edges
Speed300 RPM800 RPM
Torque2 Ncm1.5 Ncm
Use TypeSingle-useSingle-use

Best For

EdgeGlidePath

rotary glide path creationreplacing multiple hand files in glide path steppairing with EdgeEndo shaping systems

RACE EVO

simple 3-file rotary sequence with uniform motor settingsclinicians seeking improved flexibility and fatigue resistance over conventional NiTiwide range of canal anatomies with customizable file selection

Key Features

EdgeGlidePath

Single rotary glide path file replacing up to 8 instruments (hand files + Gates Glidden) with 1mm max flute diameter

RACE EVO

Latest evolution of the RaCe family — heat-treated NiTi with blue color, simple 3-file 1-2-3 sequence (glide path + 2 shapers), uniform 800-1000 RPM / 1.5 Ncm settings across all files, up to 2.8x cyclic fatigue resistance vs RaCe