Skip to content

EdgeOne Fire vs K3XF

EdgeEndo · Kerr Endodontics

TR

EdgeOne Fire™

EdgeEndo

FireWire Reciprocation

View protocol →

K3XF™

Kerr Endodontics

R-Phase Enhanced K3 Design

View protocol →

Clinical Tip

Compare specifications above to choose the best system for your clinical case.

Specifications

Specifications comparison: EdgeOne Fire vs K3XF
EdgeOne FireK3XF
ManufacturerEdgeEndoKerr Endodontics
AlloyFireWire™ Heat-Treated NiTiR-Phase™ Heat-Treated NiTi
Heat TreatmentFire-WireR-Phase
MotionReciprocatingContinuous Rotation
Files524
Taper2-6% (progressive), variableVariable
Cross-sectionTriangular, ParallelogramAsymmetric Triple-Fluted
Speed350 RPM
Torque3 Ncm
Use TypeSingle-useReusable (limited)

Best For

EdgeOne Fire

WaveOne Gold alternative with enhanced fatigue resistancesingle-file reciprocating efficiencyreduced cross-contamination

K3XF

versatile multi-taper rotary shapingclinicians familiar with K3 techniquecases requiring wide taper selection (.04-.12)

Key Features

EdgeOne Fire

FireWire heat treatment with enhanced cyclic fatigue resistance and WaveOne-compatible motor settings (manufacturer bench data)

K3XF

Original K3 asymmetric triple-fluted design enhanced with R-Phase heat treatment for improved flexibility and cyclic fatigue resistance