Skip to content

EdgeOne Fire vs Mtwo

EdgeEndo · VDW GmbH

TR

EdgeOne Fire™

EdgeEndo

FireWire Reciprocation

View protocol →

Mtwo®

VDW GmbH

The Efficient NiTi System

View protocol →

Clinical Tip

Compare specifications above to choose the best system for your clinical case.

Specifications

Specifications comparison: EdgeOne Fire vs Mtwo
EdgeOne FireMtwo
ManufacturerEdgeEndoVDW GmbH
AlloyFireWire™ Heat-Treated NiTiConventional NiTi
Heat TreatmentFire-WireConventional
MotionReciprocatingContinuous Rotation
Files516
Taper2-6% (progressive), variableVariable
Cross-sectionTriangular, ParallelogramS-shaped, S-shaped (reduced)
Speed280 RPM
Torque0.3–3 Ncm
Use TypeSingle-useReusable (limited)

Best For

EdgeOne Fire

WaveOne Gold alternative with enhanced fatigue resistancesingle-file reciprocating efficiencyreduced cross-contamination

Mtwo

Simultaneous Shaping to full WLall-in-one basic 4-file sequencewide range of apical finishing sizes

Key Features

EdgeOne Fire

FireWire heat treatment with enhanced cyclic fatigue resistance and WaveOne-compatible motor settings (manufacturer bench data)

Mtwo

Simultaneous Shaping with S-shaped cross-section — all instruments to full working length in a single sequence