Skip to content

EdgeOne Fire vs PX Wave

EdgeEndo · Perfect Dental (Shenzhen Perfect Medical Instruments)

TR

EdgeOne Fire™

EdgeEndo

FireWire Reciprocation

View protocol →

PX Wave™

Perfect Dental (Shenzhen Perfect Medical Instruments)

Single-File Reciprocating Glider

View protocol →

Clinical Tip

Compare specifications above to choose the best system for your clinical case.

Specifications

Specifications comparison: EdgeOne Fire vs PX Wave
EdgeOne FirePX Wave
ManufacturerEdgeEndoPerfect Dental (Shenzhen Perfect Medical Instruments)
AlloyFireWire™ Heat-Treated NiTiNiTi
Heat TreatmentFire-WireConventional
MotionReciprocatingReciprocating
Files51
Taper2-6% (progressive), variable2%
Cross-sectionTriangular, ParallelogramNot specified in IFU text
Speed300 RPM
Torque5 Ncm
Use TypeSingle-useSingle-use

Best For

EdgeOne Fire

WaveOne Gold alternative with enhanced fatigue resistancesingle-file reciprocating efficiencyreduced cross-contamination

PX Wave

single-file reciprocating glide pathnarrow canalsvalue-tier reciprocating workflow

Key Features

EdgeOne Fire

FireWire heat treatment with enhanced cyclic fatigue resistance and WaveOne-compatible motor settings (manufacturer bench data)

PX Wave

Single 15/.02 (ISO 015/.02) instrument at 300 rpm and 5.0 N·cm torque (per IFU spec table). Brand name "Wave" is consistent with a reciprocating instrument but the PX Wave IFU text does not explicitly call out reciprocating motion — motion type inferred from product family naming