Skip to content

EdgeOne Fire vs RC

EdgeEndo · Perfect Dental (Shenzhen Perfect Medical Instruments)

TR

EdgeOne Fire™

EdgeEndo

FireWire Reciprocation

View protocol →

RC™

Perfect Dental (Shenzhen Perfect Medical Instruments)

Reciprocating NiTi — Original

View protocol →

Clinical Tip

Compare specifications above to choose the best system for your clinical case.

Specifications

Specifications comparison: EdgeOne Fire vs RC
EdgeOne FireRC
ManufacturerEdgeEndoPerfect Dental (Shenzhen Perfect Medical Instruments)
AlloyFireWire™ Heat-Treated NiTiNiTi (conventional)
Heat TreatmentFire-WireConventional
MotionReciprocatingReciprocating
Files53
Taper2-6% (progressive), variableVariable
Cross-sectionTriangular, ParallelogramNot specified in IFU text
Speed
Torque2 Ncm
Use TypeSingle-useSingle-use

Best For

EdgeOne Fire

WaveOne Gold alternative with enhanced fatigue resistancesingle-file reciprocating efficiencyreduced cross-contamination

RC

value-tier reciprocating sequencegeneral shaping in mild–moderate curvaturepractices wanting an entry-level RC system

Key Features

EdgeOne Fire

FireWire heat treatment with enhanced cyclic fatigue resistance and WaveOne-compatible motor settings (manufacturer bench data)

RC

Three-instrument reciprocating set (R25 25/.08, R40 40/.06, R50 50/.05) operated at 250–360 rpm with 2.0–3.0 N·cm torque (per IFU spec table)