Skip to content

EdgeOne Fire vs VDW.ROTATE

EdgeEndo · VDW GmbH

TR

EdgeOne Fire™

EdgeEndo

FireWire Reciprocation

View protocol →

VDW.ROTATE®

VDW GmbH

Simplified Rotary Efficiency

View protocol →

Clinical Tip

Compare specifications above to choose the best system for your clinical case.

Specifications

Specifications comparison: EdgeOne Fire vs VDW.ROTATE
EdgeOne FireVDW.ROTATE
ManufacturerEdgeEndoVDW GmbH
AlloyFireWire™ Heat-Treated NiTiHeat-Treated NiTi
Heat TreatmentFire-WireOther
MotionReciprocatingContinuous Rotation
Files513
Taper2-6% (progressive), variableVariable
Cross-sectionTriangular, ParallelogramAdapted S
Speed300–400 RPM
Torque1.3–3.5 Ncm
Use TypeSingle-useReusable (limited)

Best For

EdgeOne Fire

WaveOne Gold alternative with enhanced fatigue resistancesingle-file reciprocating efficiencyreduced cross-contamination

VDW.ROTATE

simplified 3-file workflowversatile pecking or brushing techniquebroad canal size range with extended files

Key Features

EdgeOne Fire

FireWire heat treatment provides 2x cyclic fatigue resistance vs WaveOne Gold with WaveOne-compatible motor settings

VDW.ROTATE

3-file basic sequence with adapted S cross-section and file-specific heat treatment