Skip to content

EndoSequence vs XP-endo Finisher

Brasseler USA · FKG Dentaire

TR

EndoSequence®

Brasseler USA

Crown-Down Precision

View protocol →

XP-endo® Finisher

FKG Dentaire

3D Canal Cleaning

View protocol →

Clinical Tip

Compare specifications above to choose the best system for your clinical case.

Specifications

Specifications comparison: EndoSequence vs XP-endo Finisher
EndoSequenceXP-endo Finisher
ManufacturerBrasseler USAFKG Dentaire
AlloyConventional NiTi (Electropolished)MaxWire NiTi
Heat TreatmentConventionalMaxWire
MotionContinuous RotationContinuous Rotation
Files93
Taper4%0% (zero taper)
Cross-sectionTriangular (ACP)Sickle-shaped (zero taper, MaxWire)
Speed500 RPM800 RPM
Torque1.8 Ncm1 Ncm
Use TypeSingle-useSingle-use

Best For

EndoSequence

crown-down technique with canal-sized file kitswide range of canal sizes with dual taper (.04/.06) options — sizes 15-50 shown here, 55-80 also available as X-Large packsynchronized obturation system (BC Points + BC Sealer)

XP-endo Finisher

final 3D cleaning after any shaping systemirregular, oval, and C-shaped canal morphologiesretreatment debris removal (Finisher R variant)

Key Features

EndoSequence

Patented Alternating Contact Point (ACP) design with Expeditor canal-sizing file and crown-down technique at 500-600 RPM

XP-endo Finisher

Zero-taper sickle-shaped cleaning instrument that expands at body temperature to contact canal walls that standard instruments cannot reach