Skip to content

ESX vs XP-endo Finisher

Brasseler USA · FKG Dentaire

TR

ESX®

Brasseler USA

Two-File Shaping with Patented Booster Tip

View protocol →

XP-endo® Finisher

FKG Dentaire

3D Canal Cleaning

View protocol →

Clinical Tip

Compare specifications above to choose the best system for your clinical case.

Specifications

Specifications comparison: ESX vs XP-endo Finisher
ESXXP-endo Finisher
ManufacturerBrasseler USAFKG Dentaire
AlloyElectropolished NiTiMaxWire NiTi
Heat TreatmentConventionalMaxWire
MotionContinuous RotationContinuous Rotation
Files83
TaperVariable0% (zero taper)
Cross-sectionTriangular (asymmetrical ACP)Sickle-shaped (zero taper, MaxWire)
Speed500 RPM800 RPM
Torque1.5 Ncm1 Ncm
Use TypeSingle-useSingle-use

Best For

ESX

minimally invasive two-file canal preparationconservative coronal tooth structure preservationcases where adaptive finishing file size selection is preferred

XP-endo Finisher

final 3D cleaning after any shaping systemirregular, oval, and C-shaped canal morphologiesretreatment debris removal (Finisher R variant)

Key Features

ESX

Two-file shaping system with patented ACP (Alternating Contact Point) design and Booster Tip for minimally invasive canal preparation at 500-600 RPM

XP-endo Finisher

Zero-taper sickle-shaped cleaning instrument that expands at body temperature to contact canal walls that standard instruments cannot reach