Skip to content

HyFlex EDM vs VDW.ROTATE

Coltene · VDW GmbH

TR

HyFlex® EDM

Coltene

Controlled Memory

View protocol →

VDW.ROTATE®

VDW GmbH

Simplified Rotary Efficiency

View protocol →

Clinical Tip

Compare specifications above to choose the best system for your clinical case.

Specifications

Specifications comparison: HyFlex EDM vs VDW.ROTATE
HyFlex EDMVDW.ROTATE
ManufacturerColteneVDW GmbH
AlloyCM-Wire (EDM manufactured)Heat-Treated NiTi
Heat TreatmentCM-WireOther
MotionContinuous RotationContinuous Rotation
Files813
TaperVariableVariable
Cross-sectionTriangular, Square, Variable (quadratic tip, trapezoidal middle, triangular coronal)Adapted S
Speed300–400 RPM300–400 RPM
Torque1.8–2.5 Ncm1.3–3.5 Ncm
Use TypeReusable (limited)Reusable (limited)

Best For

HyFlex EDM

extreme curvaturesfatigue resistance priorityreusable with regeneration

VDW.ROTATE

simplified 3-file workflowversatile pecking or brushing techniquebroad canal size range with extended files

Key Features

HyFlex EDM

Up to 700% greater fatigue resistance with regenerative memory (manufacturer data; brochure reports up to 1,200% vs specific competitors)

VDW.ROTATE

3-file basic sequence with adapted S cross-section and file-specific heat treatment