Skip to content

HyFlex GPF vs Mtwo

Coltene · VDW GmbH

TR

HyFlex® GPF

Coltene

Controlled Memory Glide Path Files

View protocol →

Mtwo®

VDW GmbH

The Efficient NiTi System

View protocol →

Clinical Tip

Compare specifications above to choose the best system for your clinical case.

Specifications

Specifications comparison: HyFlex GPF vs Mtwo
HyFlex GPFMtwo
ManufacturerColteneVDW GmbH
AlloyCM-Wire (Controlled Memory NiTi)Conventional NiTi
Heat TreatmentCM-WireConventional
MotionContinuous RotationContinuous Rotation
Files316
Taper1%, 2%Variable
Cross-sectionNot stated in brochureS-shaped, S-shaped (reduced)
Speed500 RPM280 RPM
Torque2.5 Ncm0.3–3 Ncm
Use TypeReusable (limited)Reusable (limited)

Best For

HyFlex GPF

mechanical glide path creationintegration with HyFlex CM/EDM shaping systemscurved canals requiring pre-bendable glide path files

Mtwo

Simultaneous Shaping to full WLall-in-one basic 4-file sequencewide range of apical finishing sizes

Key Features

HyFlex GPF

Dedicated rotary glide path system with CM-Wire flexibility, available as Navigator NT (15/01) and CM K Files (15/02, 20/02) for safe and efficient glide path creation

Mtwo

Simultaneous Shaping with S-shaped cross-section — all instruments to full working length in a single sequence