Skip to content

HyFlex GPF vs 2Shape

Coltene · Micro-Mega (COLTENE)

TR

HyFlex® GPF

Coltene

Controlled Memory Glide Path Files

View protocol →

2Shape®

Micro-Mega (COLTENE)

Two-File Simplicity

View protocol →

Clinical Tip

Compare specifications above to choose the best system for your clinical case.

Specifications

Specifications comparison: HyFlex GPF vs 2Shape
HyFlex GPF2Shape
ManufacturerColteneMicro-Mega (COLTENE)
AlloyCM-Wire (Controlled Memory NiTi)T.Wire Heat-Treated NiTi
Heat TreatmentCM-WireOther
MotionContinuous RotationContinuous Rotation
Files34
Taper1%, 2%.04, .06
Cross-sectionNot stated in brochureAsymmetrical triple helix
Speed500 RPM250 RPM
Torque2.5 Ncm2–2.5 Ncm
Use TypeReusable (limited)Reusable (limited)

Best For

HyFlex GPF

mechanical glide path creationintegration with HyFlex CM/EDM shaping systemscurved canals requiring pre-bendable glide path files

2Shape

simplified 2-file shapingEU/ME market standardasymmetrical triple helix debris removal

Key Features

HyFlex GPF

Dedicated rotary glide path system with CM-Wire flexibility, available as Navigator NT (15/01) and CM K Files (15/02, 20/02) for safe and efficient glide path creation

2Shape

Intuitive 2-file sequence (TS1+TS2) with asymmetrical triple helix cross-section and T.Wire heat treatment