Skip to content

iRaCe vs XP-endo Finisher

FKG Dentaire

TR

iRaCe®

FKG Dentaire

3-File Simplicity

View protocol →

XP-endo® Finisher

FKG Dentaire

3D Canal Cleaning

View protocol →

Clinical Tip

Compare specifications above to choose the best system for your clinical case.

Specifications

Specifications comparison: iRaCe vs XP-endo Finisher
iRaCeXP-endo Finisher
ManufacturerFKG DentaireFKG Dentaire
AlloyConventional NiTi (Electropolished)MaxWire NiTi
Heat TreatmentConventionalMaxWire
MotionContinuous RotationContinuous Rotation
Files53
TaperVariable0% (zero taper)
Cross-sectionTriangularSickle-shaped (zero taper, MaxWire)
Speed600 RPM800 RPM
Torque1.5 Ncm1 Ncm
Use TypeReusable (limited)Single-use

Best For

iRaCe

simplified 3-file rotary sequencedifficult canals via iRaCe Plus extension (narrow, curved, calcified)individual file selection approach

XP-endo Finisher

final 3D cleaning after any shaping systemirregular, oval, and C-shaped canal morphologiesretreatment debris removal (Finisher R variant)

Key Features

iRaCe

Simplified 3-file sequence (R1-R2-R3) with iRaCe Plus extension for difficult canals — alternating cutting edges and triangular cross-section at 600 RPM

XP-endo Finisher

Zero-taper sickle-shaped cleaning instrument that expands at body temperature to contact canal walls that standard instruments cannot reach