Skip to content

PX Wave vs RACE EVO

Perfect Dental (Shenzhen Perfect Medical Instruments) · FKG Dentaire

TR

PX Wave™

Perfect Dental (Shenzhen Perfect Medical Instruments)

Single-File Reciprocating Glider

View protocol →

RACE® EVO

FKG Dentaire

Heat-Treated 1-2-3 Sequence

View protocol →

Clinical Tip

Compare specifications above to choose the best system for your clinical case.

Specifications

Specifications comparison: PX Wave vs RACE EVO
PX WaveRACE EVO
ManufacturerPerfect Dental (Shenzhen Perfect Medical Instruments)FKG Dentaire
AlloyNiTiHeat-Treated NiTi (Blue)
Heat TreatmentConventionalBlue Heat-Treated
MotionReciprocatingContinuous Rotation
Files13
Taper2%4%
Cross-sectionNot specified in IFU textTriangular with alternating cutting edges
Speed300 RPM800 RPM
Torque5 Ncm1.5 Ncm
Use TypeSingle-useSingle-use

Best For

PX Wave

single-file reciprocating glide pathnarrow canalsvalue-tier reciprocating workflow

RACE EVO

simple 3-file rotary sequence with uniform motor settingsclinicians seeking improved flexibility and fatigue resistance over conventional NiTiwide range of canal anatomies with customizable file selection

Key Features

PX Wave

Single 15/.02 (ISO 015/.02) instrument at 300 rpm and 5.0 N·cm torque (per IFU spec table). Brand name "Wave" is consistent with a reciprocating instrument but the PX Wave IFU text does not explicitly call out reciprocating motion — motion type inferred from product family naming

RACE EVO

Latest evolution of the RaCe family — heat-treated NiTi with blue color, simple 3-file 1-2-3 sequence (glide path + 2 shapers), uniform 800-1000 RPM / 1.5 Ncm settings across all files, up to 2.8x cyclic fatigue resistance vs RaCe