Skip to content

TF4 vs XP-endo Finisher

Perfect Dental (Shenzhen Perfect Medical Instruments) · FKG Dentaire

TR

TF4™

Perfect Dental (Shenzhen Perfect Medical Instruments)

Rotary + Reciprocating Hybrid Sequence

View protocol →

XP-endo® Finisher

FKG Dentaire

3D Canal Cleaning

View protocol →

Clinical Tip

Compare specifications above to choose the best system for your clinical case.

Specifications

Specifications comparison: TF4 vs XP-endo Finisher
TF4XP-endo Finisher
ManufacturerPerfect Dental (Shenzhen Perfect Medical Instruments)FKG Dentaire
AlloyNiTiMaxWire NiTi
Heat TreatmentConventionalMaxWire
MotionContinuous RotationContinuous Rotation
Files43
TaperVariable0% (zero taper)
Cross-sectionNot specified by name in IFU textSickle-shaped (zero taper, MaxWire)
Speed350 RPM800 RPM
Torque2 Ncm1 Ncm
Use TypeSingle-useSingle-use

Best For

TF4

rotary + reciprocating hybrid workflowclinicians comfortable switching motor modes mid-casemoderate-curvature anatomy

XP-endo Finisher

final 3D cleaning after any shaping systemirregular, oval, and C-shaped canal morphologiesretreatment debris removal (Finisher R variant)

Key Features

TF4

Four-file hybrid sequence (T20 20/.07, T25 25/.07, T35 35/.06, T45 45/.05) where T25 25/.07 is run in reciprocating motion within an otherwise rotary workflow at 350 rpm / 2.0–3.0 N·cm (per IFU spec table and step-by-step)

XP-endo Finisher

Zero-taper sickle-shaped cleaning instrument that expands at body temperature to contact canal walls that standard instruments cannot reach