Skip to content

ProGlider vs XP-endo Finisher

Dentsply Sirona · FKG Dentaire

TR

ProGlider®

Dentsply Sirona

Mechanical Glide Path in One File

View protocol →

XP-endo® Finisher

FKG Dentaire

3D Canal Cleaning

View protocol →

Clinical Tip

Compare specifications above to choose the best system for your clinical case.

Specifications

Specifications comparison: ProGlider vs XP-endo Finisher
ProGliderXP-endo Finisher
ManufacturerDentsply SironaFKG Dentaire
AlloyM-Wire NiTiMaxWire NiTi
Heat TreatmentM-WireMaxWire
MotionContinuous RotationContinuous Rotation
Files13
Taper2% (variable progressive to 8.5% at D16)0% (zero taper)
Cross-sectionSquareSickle-shaped (zero taper, MaxWire)
Speed300 RPM800 RPM
Torque2 Ncm1 Ncm
Use TypeSingle-useSingle-use

Best For

ProGlider

single-file mechanical glide pathcompanion to ProTaper Gold, ProTaper Next, ProTaper Ultimate, and Vortex Bluereplacing multi-file PathFile sequence

XP-endo Finisher

final 3D cleaning after any shaping systemirregular, oval, and C-shaped canal morphologiesretreatment debris removal (Finisher R variant)

Key Features

ProGlider

Single-file mechanical glide path with variable progressive taper (016/.02 to .085 at D16) for gentle canal enlargement before shaping

XP-endo Finisher

Zero-taper sickle-shaped cleaning instrument that expands at body temperature to contact canal walls that standard instruments cannot reach