Skip to content

ProTaper Next vs XP-endo Finisher

Dentsply Sirona · FKG Dentaire

TR

ProTaper Next®

Dentsply Sirona

Progressive Efficiency

View protocol →

XP-endo® Finisher

FKG Dentaire

3D Canal Cleaning

View protocol →

Clinical Tip

Compare specifications above to choose the best system for your clinical case.

Specifications

Specifications comparison: ProTaper Next vs XP-endo Finisher
ProTaper NextXP-endo Finisher
ManufacturerDentsply SironaFKG Dentaire
AlloyM-Wire NiTiMaxWire NiTi
Heat TreatmentM-WireMaxWire
MotionContinuous RotationContinuous Rotation
Files63
TaperVariable0% (zero taper)
Cross-sectionNot specified by manufacturer, Off-centered rectangularSickle-shaped (zero taper, MaxWire)
Speed300 RPM800 RPM
Torque2 Ncm1 Ncm
Use TypeSingle-useSingle-use

Best For

ProTaper Next

off-centered swaggering motionreduced file engagementprogressive shaping

XP-endo Finisher

final 3D cleaning after any shaping systemirregular, oval, and C-shaped canal morphologiesretreatment debris removal (Finisher R variant)

Key Features

ProTaper Next

Off-centered rectangular cross-section creates swaggering motion for improved debris removal

XP-endo Finisher

Zero-taper sickle-shaped cleaning instrument that expands at body temperature to contact canal walls that standard instruments cannot reach