Skip to content

Traverse vs XP-endo Retreatment

Kerr Endodontics · FKG Dentaire

TR

Traverse™

Kerr Endodontics

Own the Glide Path

View protocol →

XP-endo® Retreatment

FKG Dentaire

Adaptive Retreatment Sequence

View protocol →

Clinical Tip

Compare specifications above to choose the best system for your clinical case.

Specifications

Specifications comparison: Traverse vs XP-endo Retreatment
TraverseXP-endo Retreatment
ManufacturerKerr EndodonticsFKG Dentaire
AlloyNiTiMaxWire (NiTi alloy)
Heat TreatmentConventionalMaxWire
MotionContinuous RotationContinuous Rotation
Files33
Taper8%, 6%Variable
Cross-sectionTriangularActive cutting tip, Booster Tip (6 cutting edges at tip, triangular shaft), Zero-taper sickle-shaped (cleaning, non-shaping)
Speed500 RPM800–1000 RPM
Torque1.47 Ncm1–1.5 Ncm
Use TypeSingle-useSingle-use

Best For

Traverse

rotary glide path creationpairing with TF Adaptive systemfaster glide path vs hand files alone

XP-endo Retreatment

retreatment of previously obturated canalsgutta percha and sealer removal3D cleaning of canal walls after GP removal

Key Features

Traverse

Rotary glide path system with orifice opener and two glide path file sizes — pre-sterilized, triangular cross-section, higher torsional resistance vs competitors (manufacturer comparison)

XP-endo Retreatment

Dedicated 3-file retreatment sequence — DR1 active-tip desobturation, XP-endo Shaper gutta percha removal at up to 2500 RPM, and XP-endo Finisher R final cleaning