Skip to content

TruNatomy vs XP-endo Finisher

Dentsply Sirona · FKG Dentaire

TR

TruNatomy®

Dentsply Sirona

True, Natural, Anatomy

View protocol →

XP-endo® Finisher

FKG Dentaire

3D Canal Cleaning

View protocol →

Clinical Tip

Compare specifications above to choose the best system for your clinical case.

Specifications

Specifications comparison: TruNatomy vs XP-endo Finisher
TruNatomyXP-endo Finisher
ManufacturerDentsply SironaFKG Dentaire
AlloyHeat-Treated NiTiMaxWire NiTi
Heat TreatmentOtherMaxWire
MotionContinuous RotationContinuous Rotation
Files63
TaperVariable0% (zero taper)
Cross-sectionOff-centered parallelogram, Centered parallelogram (2 cutting edges)Sickle-shaped (zero taper, MaxWire)
Speed500 RPM800 RPM
Torque1.5 Ncm1 Ncm
Use TypeSingle-useSingle-use

Best For

TruNatomy

dentin preservationconservative accessminimally invasive

XP-endo Finisher

final 3D cleaning after any shaping systemirregular, oval, and C-shaped canal morphologiesretreatment debris removal (Finisher R variant)

Key Features

TruNatomy

Slim 0.8mm MFD with off-centered parallelogram cross-section preserves peri-cervical dentin while maintaining shaping efficiency

XP-endo Finisher

Zero-taper sickle-shaped cleaning instrument that expands at body temperature to contact canal walls that standard instruments cannot reach