Skip to content

2Shape vs XP-endo Finisher

Micro-Mega (COLTENE) · FKG Dentaire

TR

2Shape®

Micro-Mega (COLTENE)

Two-File Simplicity

View protocol →

XP-endo® Finisher

FKG Dentaire

3D Canal Cleaning

View protocol →

Clinical Tip

Compare specifications above to choose the best system for your clinical case.

Specifications

Specifications comparison: 2Shape vs XP-endo Finisher
2ShapeXP-endo Finisher
ManufacturerMicro-Mega (COLTENE)FKG Dentaire
AlloyT.Wire Heat-Treated NiTiMaxWire NiTi
Heat TreatmentOtherMaxWire
MotionContinuous RotationContinuous Rotation
Files43
Taper.04, .060% (zero taper)
Cross-sectionAsymmetrical triple helixSickle-shaped (zero taper, MaxWire)
Speed250 RPM800 RPM
Torque2–2.5 Ncm1 Ncm
Use TypeReusable (limited)Single-use

Best For

2Shape

simplified 2-file shapingEU/ME market standardasymmetrical triple helix debris removal

XP-endo Finisher

final 3D cleaning after any shaping systemirregular, oval, and C-shaped canal morphologiesretreatment debris removal (Finisher R variant)

Key Features

2Shape

Intuitive 2-file sequence (TS1+TS2) with asymmetrical triple helix cross-section and T.Wire heat treatment

XP-endo Finisher

Zero-taper sickle-shaped cleaning instrument that expands at body temperature to contact canal walls that standard instruments cannot reach