Skip to content
Home
Concept

Pulpotomy vs Pulpectomy

How pulpotomy and pulpectomy differ in how much pulp is removed, when each is considered, and the goal of treatment, based on AAE/ESE guidance.

Pulpotomy and pulpectomy both manage an inflamed or exposed pulp, but they differ in how much of the pulp is removed. A pulpotomy removes only the coronal pulp and aims to keep the radicular pulp alive, while a pulpectomy removes the whole pulp from the crown and the canals. The practical difference usually comes down to how healthy the remaining pulp is judged to be and the goal of treatment. The contrast below summarizes the features clinicians typically weigh; the choice depends on the individual case and is made by the treating clinician.

Frequently asked

01

Is a pulpotomy the same as a root canal?

Answer

No.

  • 01A pulpotomy removes only the coronal pulp and aims to keep the root pulp alive, while a root canal (pulpectomy and obturation) removes the whole pulp.
  • 02The two have different goals, and which one applies depends on the condition of the pulp.
02

Can a pulpotomy be used in adult teeth?

Answer

Full pulpotomy in mature permanent teeth with irreversible pulpitis is an area of active study, with some encouraging outcomes reported.

  • 01Whether it is suitable depends on the case, and the decision is made by the treating clinician rather than as a routine substitute for root canal treatment.
03

How is it decided which one to do?

Answer

It generally depends on how healthy the remaining pulp is judged to be, the diagnosis, and the tooth.

  • 01If the radicular pulp is considered able to heal, a pulpotomy may be considered; if not, a pulpectomy may be more appropriate.
  • 02The clinician weighs the full picture.

Other Concepts

Uzm. Dt. Levent Yüksel

Reviewed by

Uzm. Dt. Levent Yüksel

DDS · Endodontist

Independently authored and clinically reviewed.