Skip to content

HyFlex GPF vs XP-endo Finisher

Coltene · FKG Dentaire

TR

HyFlex® GPF

Coltene

Controlled Memory Glide Path Files

View protocol →

XP-endo® Finisher

FKG Dentaire

3D Canal Cleaning

View protocol →

Clinical Tip

Compare specifications above to choose the best system for your clinical case.

Specifications

Specifications comparison: HyFlex GPF vs XP-endo Finisher
HyFlex GPFXP-endo Finisher
ManufacturerColteneFKG Dentaire
AlloyCM-Wire (Controlled Memory NiTi)MaxWire NiTi
Heat TreatmentCM-WireMaxWire
MotionContinuous RotationContinuous Rotation
Files33
Taper1%, 2%0% (zero taper)
Cross-sectionNot stated in brochureSickle-shaped (zero taper, MaxWire)
Speed500 RPM800 RPM
Torque2.5 Ncm1 Ncm
Use TypeReusable (limited)Single-use

Best For

HyFlex GPF

mechanical glide path creationintegration with HyFlex CM/EDM shaping systemscurved canals requiring pre-bendable glide path files

XP-endo Finisher

final 3D cleaning after any shaping systemirregular, oval, and C-shaped canal morphologiesretreatment debris removal (Finisher R variant)

Key Features

HyFlex GPF

Dedicated rotary glide path system with CM-Wire flexibility, available as Navigator NT (15/01) and CM K Files (15/02, 20/02) for safe and efficient glide path creation

XP-endo Finisher

Zero-taper sickle-shaped cleaning instrument that expands at body temperature to contact canal walls that standard instruments cannot reach