Skip to content

Mtwo vs ProTaper Next

VDW GmbH · Dentsply Sirona

TR

Mtwo®

VDW GmbH

The Efficient NiTi System

View protocol →

ProTaper Next®

Dentsply Sirona

Progressive Efficiency

View protocol →

Clinical Tip

Compare specifications above to choose the best system for your clinical case.

Specifications

Specifications comparison: Mtwo vs ProTaper Next
MtwoProTaper Next
ManufacturerVDW GmbHDentsply Sirona
AlloyConventional NiTiM-Wire NiTi
Heat TreatmentConventionalM-Wire
MotionContinuous RotationContinuous Rotation
Files166
TaperVariableVariable
Cross-sectionS-shaped, S-shaped (reduced)Not specified by manufacturer, Off-centered rectangular
Speed280 RPM300 RPM
Torque0.3–3 Ncm2 Ncm
Use TypeReusable (limited)Single-use

Best For

Mtwo

Simultaneous Shaping to full WLall-in-one basic 4-file sequencewide range of apical finishing sizes

ProTaper Next

off-centered swaggering motionreduced file engagementprogressive shaping

Key Features

Mtwo

Simultaneous Shaping with S-shaped cross-section — all instruments to full working length in a single sequence

ProTaper Next

Off-centered rectangular cross-section creates swaggering motion for improved debris removal