Skip to content

iRaCe vs RACE EVO

FKG Dentaire

TR

iRaCe®

FKG Dentaire

3-File Simplicity

View protocol →

RACE® EVO

FKG Dentaire

Heat-Treated 1-2-3 Sequence

View protocol →

Clinical Tip

Compare specifications above to choose the best system for your clinical case.

Specifications

Specifications comparison: iRaCe vs RACE EVO
iRaCeRACE EVO
ManufacturerFKG DentaireFKG Dentaire
AlloyConventional NiTi (Electropolished)Heat-Treated NiTi (Blue)
Heat TreatmentConventionalBlue Heat-Treated
MotionContinuous RotationContinuous Rotation
Files53
TaperVariable4%
Cross-sectionTriangularTriangular with alternating cutting edges
Speed600 RPM800 RPM
Torque1.5 Ncm1.5 Ncm
Use TypeReusable (limited)Single-use

Best For

iRaCe

simplified 3-file rotary sequencedifficult canals via iRaCe Plus extension (narrow, curved, calcified)individual file selection approach

RACE EVO

simple 3-file rotary sequence with uniform motor settingsclinicians seeking improved flexibility and fatigue resistance over conventional NiTiwide range of canal anatomies with customizable file selection

Key Features

iRaCe

Simplified 3-file sequence (R1-R2-R3) with iRaCe Plus extension for difficult canals — alternating cutting edges and triangular cross-section at 600 RPM

RACE EVO

Latest evolution of the RaCe family — heat-treated NiTi with blue color, simple 3-file 1-2-3 sequence (glide path + 2 shapers), uniform 800-1000 RPM / 1.5 Ncm settings across all files, up to 2.8x cyclic fatigue resistance vs RaCe